The United Nations has voiced strong concerns regarding the recently ratified Maldives Media and Broadcasting Act, asserting that it infringes upon international treaties to which the Maldives is a signatory.
President Dr. Mohamed Muizzu's ratification of the act has drawn criticism, with the UN warning of potential severe impacts on media freedom and freedom of expression within the island nation.
The new legislation, passed on the 18th of this month amidst public protests, has prompted Maldivian journalists to appeal to international agencies and organizations for support.
Ravina Shamdasani, spokesperson for the UN Human Rights Office, issued a statement declaring that if the act is not withdrawn, it "will seriously undermine media freedom and the right to freedom of expression for the people of the Maldives."
A key point of contention is that the regulations established under this law are deemed to violate the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which the Maldives is a signatory. The UN highlights provisions within the law that are seen as severely restricting access for media and journalists.
Furthermore, the UN has specifically called out the newly formed Maldives Media and Broadcasting Commission (MMBC), which is empowered by the act to conduct investigations, fine reporters, and revoke media licenses and permits.
Journalists protest against a contentious media bill outside the Parliament Building on September 16, 2025. (Sun Photo/Moosa Nadheem)
Shamdasani noted that "The new law follows a worrying erosion of institutional checks and balances in the past year," emphasizing that a free and diverse media is fundamental to both freedom of expression and a democratic society.
The passage of this law has occurred despite persistent concerns and protests from journalists and both local and international organizations.
Key concerns regarding the media law:
Article 39 and Regulatory Interpretation: This article outlines specific regulations for journalism. Critics worry that this provision could allow the regulatory commission to manipulate the law's intent and exploit individual clauses. For example, the directive to maintain national security is considered to have an excessively broad interpretation, creating potential for abuse.
Broad Interpretation of Code of Conduct: The article pertaining to the code of conduct, which emphasizes respecting individual freedoms and prohibiting the spread of false information, is also viewed as having an overly broad interpretation. This has led to widespread concern among journalists that those in power within the commission could exploit this ambiguity.