The move to oust Supreme Court justices Dr. Azmiralda Zahir and Mahaz Ali Zahir lacks proper legal justification or proof, said Velidhoo MP Mohamed Abbas on Wednesday, as the Parliament was poised to take a vote which led to the dismissal of the two judges.
On Wednesday afternoon, the ruling People’s National Congress (PNC) used its supermajority to push through the dismissal of Azmiralda and Mahaz, despite serious concerns regarding lack of due process and procedural fairness in the disciplinary proceedings against them by the Judicial Service Commission (JSC).
An hour ahead of the vote, Abbas, a parliamentarian from the Maldives Development Alliance (MDA), took to X to publicly announce his opposition to the move.
Abbas said that it is not a matter that can be taken lightly and that removal of judges from the highest court of the Maldives must be based on clear, compelling, and legally admissible evidence.
But he said that he has not seen any proper legal justification or proof to warrant their dismissal.
“In this case, I have not seen any such evidence presented to this Majlis. No proper legal justification or proof has been submitted that meets the standards required under the Constitution,” he said.
Referring to Article 75 of the Constitution, Abbas said he is duty-bound to act in the best interests of the people, and to uphold justice, fairness, and the independence of democratic institutions.
“I believe that rushing into such a decision without adequate legal basis would set a dangerous precedent, and directly undermine the independence of the judiciary,” said Abbas, adding that therefore cannot and will not support the justices’ dismissal.
“I stand with the Constitution. I stand with judicial independence. And most importantly, I stand with the people,” he said.
As a Member of Parliament elected to serve the people and uphold the Constitution of the Maldives, I wish to place on record my strong opposition to the bill proposing the termination of two judges of the Supreme Court.This is not a matter that can be taken lightly. The removal…
— Mohamed Abbas (@Abbasvelidhoo) May 14, 2025
On February 26, Azmiralda, Mahaz and then-Supreme Court justice Husnu Al-Suood were suspended by the JSC, citing an ongoing investigation by the against them by the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC). Their suspension came less than one hour ahead of a hearing scheduled at the Supreme Court regarding a request for an injunction to suspend the enforcement of controversial anti-defection clauses that were written into the Constitution last year. It also came shortly after the ruling PNC used its supermajority in the Parliament to push through amendments to the Judicature Act to downsize the Supreme Court bench from seven to five justices.
Suood resigned from the top court in protest of JSC’s decision, and the commission later opened misconduct investigations against Azmiralda and Mahaz, accusing them of conspiring to influence a Criminal Court judge.
On May 4, the JSC asked the Parliament to approve their dismissal. The Judiciary Committee, which reviewed the recommendation, decided on Saturday to deny Azmiralda and Mahaz the chance to defend themselves against the allegations against them. The next day, the committee voted in favor of their dismissal in a closed-door meeting that was boycotted by members of the MDP. The decision came despite the Parliament’s Counsel General Fathimath Filza advising the committee that the JSC had failed to follow due process and proper procedure in making the decision.
However, the committee’s chair Husnee Mubarik, a politician from the PNC, said that it was her personal opinion, and one what is not shared by the council.
On Wednesday, Azmiralda and Mahaz - both of whom claim that the allegations against them are baseless and that the investigations by the JSC were tainted by the denial of due process to them - were dismissed with majority votes of 68-11.
The vote against them came as a crowd of MDP protestors gathered outside the Parliament to demonstrate against their dismissal.
The case against the Supreme Court justices stem from the allegation that they exerted their influence over the Criminal Court to secure the release of Azmiralda’s husband, Dr. Ismail Latheef, an anesthesiologist, who was arrested during a police raid on a massage parlor in Male’. However, Criminal Court judge Ibrahim Zihunee’s statement to JSC shows Mahaz had called him after Latheef was already released from police custody.
Meanwhile, the then-assistant registrar of High Court, Hussain Mohamed Haneef, who testified against Azmiralda and Mahaz at the JSC, was recently appointed to a senior position at state-run utility company, Fenaka Corporation.
The ACC has declined to provide any information regarding the their criminal investigation against the trio, which had triggered their suspension in the first place.
The JSC has come under fire from both local and international organizations over its decision to push for the dismissal of the Supreme Court justices. Those that have expressed concern over the situation include the Bar Council of Maldives, Margaret Satterthwaite, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers, the Human Rights Watch, the Commonwealth Law Association, the Law Association for Asia and the Pacific (LAWASIA), and the Bar Association of India.
President Dr. Mohamed Muizzu, whose administration has been accused of deliberately undermining the country’s judicial independence, denied these claims in a press briefing on May 3, describing the events that fueled the allegations as mere “coincidences.”